What is stranger-owned life insurance?

What is stranger-owned life insurance?

By Tony Steuer, CLU, LA

Stranger-owned life insurance (STOLI) is exactly as it sounds – life insurance originated by a stranger. Typically, they are initiated by a third party looking to own and control a policy from the beginning.

Here are some issues to keep in mind when reviewing a STOLI transaction:

Future Insurability

If the maximum amount of life insurance were purchased on a single life, then that insured would probably not be able to ever purchase life insurance again.

This is an especially important factor – as the capacity for life insurance is shrinking both in the U.S. and around the world, it is becoming difficult it not impossible to write large amounts of life insurance (partially due to STOLI).

Ethical/Moral Issues 

Here’s a list of issues to be concerned about when reviewing a STOLI transaction.

There are ethical and moral concerns with selling your life insurance and/or insurability – used life insurance capacity – to an investor group or stranger.

Appropriate Disclosures

There are no standards disclosures at this time.

Policy Resale

The original purchaser is not obligated to keep the policy; they can resell it.

Privacy

Life settlement contracts have little protection for personal and health information.

Violations of State “Insurable Interest” Insurance Laws and Regulations

Third-party investors offer the insureds two years of “free” insurance, because it is illegal for them to purchase insurance on the life of an individual unless the original applicant-owner has an insurable interest at the time the policy was purchased.

Without an insurable interest, the policy is void from inception and the death benefit will not be paid to the investors. To protect the public, all states have insurable interest statutes designed to discourage speculation on an insured’s life.

Litigation Risks

If a state insurance departments rules that an insurance interest law is violated, the insured’s trust and estate, and their agents and advisors, may become embroiled in unexpected litigation.

Premium Financing Issues

There are specials issues regarding the cost of repaying the loan and ultimately keeping the policy. It is very unusual for an insured to participate in a “free” premium financing program with the primary intent of replaying the loan after two years and keeping the insurance for the originally stated “insurable interest” purpose.

In general, the purpose of the repayment option is to give apparent legitimacy to the insurance transaction and not to encourage repayment. In fact, the insured usually have lower-cost private of commercial recourse financing available as an alternative.

The decision to use higher-cost non-recourse financing is yet another indication that the insured never intended to pay premiums after the second policy year.

Fraud and Misrepresentation

The standard life insurance application requires insureds to sign written statements regarding their health, financial circumstances, policy ownership, and purpose of the insurance. Companies reply on this information to issue coverage.

The insured, or the insured’s family, may be liable for the investors’ loss, if any misrepresentation of these items is discovered during the contestable period. If the misrepresentation is intentional and material, it may give rise to fraud that extend beyond the contestable period.

Rebating

Another area of risk to insureds is the use of cash incentives to purchase the policy. The New State Insurance Department General Counsel Opinion – citing lack of insurable interest for one of these transactions – point out that “free insurance” might constitute as an illegal rebate.

Violation of State Insurance Statutes on “Wet Ink” Viaticals

Many states have enacted model statutes prohibiting the sale of life insurance as an investment for the benefit of disinterested third party. To guard against so-called wet ink viatical transactions, the NAIC’s Viatical Settlement Model Regulation has been adopted by a number of states to prohibit the sale of insurance policies within 24 months of the policy issue date.

Potential Violations of Federal or State Securities Law

Advisors must consider these programs as possible securities transactions, in addition to insurance law issues.

Failure to Comply with the Patriot Act

Some counties have more favorable tax laws regarding investor-owned life insurance that make U.S. – issued life insurance policies particularly attractive. Consequently, foreign investors have entered both the non-recourse premium-financing market and the life settlement arena.

Unknown Cost of the Unpaid Loan

There does not appear to be any clear or certain guidance regarding the tax consequences related to non-payment of the loan. The tax opinions will vary from advisor-to-advisor and from transaction-to-transaction.

Estate Tax on the Death Benefit

Since the investors are looking for insureds with a projected life expectancy of 120 months (ten years) or less, advisors must evaluate the risk that the death benefit will be included in the insured’s taxable estate, if they die during this period.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.